Adams County Republican Central Committee

🚨 It's official: Idaho's pro-life laws will be on the ballot in November thanks to the unholy alliance of Big Pharma and pro-infanticide forces.

The ballot language is almost a carbon copy of the initiative that passed a few years ago in Ohio: Not only would it remove protections for the unborn all the way through birth, but it would also supersede Idaho's regulatory and statutory prohibitions on s*x change surgeries and hormone therapies for minors as a part of an expansively defined “right to 'reproductive care.'”

Our state has protected unborn life for over a century and every patriotic Idahoan needs to get out in November and reject the latest attempt to turn our state into a Portland, Oregon Planned Parenthood clinic.

"We can't afford to eliminate property taxes." I hear it constantly. It is backwards, and here is the information almost nobody gets told.

Start with a premise both parties forget: government is not efficient with your money. It spends what it takes in, and then says it needs more.

Here is the proof. From 2020 to 2026, the state of Idaho grew its spending by $1.2 billion MORE than inflation and population growth combined. Not to keep up with a growing state and rising costs. Beyond them.

That $1.2 billion, the growth the state chose to pour into bigger government, would have cut your property tax in HALF if we had returned it to you instead.

And this is not theoretical. The state already pays $328 million of your property tax directly, out of state funds, through HB 292 and HB 521. The whole property tax is just over $2.5 billion. The mechanism is already running. We just have to finish the job with the growth we already have.

One more thing, because someone always says, "that is just inflation." It is not. Idaho is the number one fastest-growing state economy in America, up 22 percent after inflation. The growth is real. The state just keeps spending it instead of returning it.

Let growth retire the property tax and let you actually own your home instead of renting it back from the county forever.

There is a mother somewhere in Idaho tonight who believes she will always be the first call. That if her teenage daughter were ever scared, or in trouble, she would be the one to know. She is wrong, and she does not know it yet.

On your Idaho ballot this November 3rd is an initiative that would let her 15-year-old daughter get an abortion, up to six months of pregnancy, without that mother ever being told. No consent. No notice. She would find out only if her daughter chose to tell her.

I read the whole initiative so I could tell you exactly what is in it. Three things stood out.

A minor can get an abortion at six months, with no parent notified.

It allows abortion up to birth, under a "health" exception so broad it has no real limit.

And it keeps fewer safeguards than Roe ever did. No requirement that a physician even perform it, and no waiting period.

You can hold almost any view on abortion and still believe a mother deserves to know, and still feel this goes too far for Idaho. It would be one of the most extreme abortion laws in America, in the state that has protected life since 1864.

I am voting NO. If you are a parent, tell me what you think below. Follow this page and I will keep bringing you what is actually on your Idaho ballot.

DOJ WARNING: The Justice Department has sent letters to election officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, warning them that they could face criminal prosecution if they knowingly allow noncitizens to vote in federal elections or fail to comply with federal voter registration laws.

Why does Idaho care about California’s Plastics Act? Well, no state should get to write regulations for the other forty-nine. That’s the constitutional principle California ignored with its Plastics Act, and it’s why Idaho joined 16 other states suing to strike it down.

The Constitution doesn't allow one state to reach across its own borders and dictate how businesses everywhere else operate. California’s law does exactly that. It regulates packaging made of aluminum, cardboard, paper, glass, and wood, not just plastic, and forces businesses nationwide to redesign their packaging just to keep selling in California’s market. It also hands enforcement and taxing power, up to $500 million a year, to a private organization called the Circular Action Alliance, with almost no state oversight.

Idaho families will pay more for everyday goods because California decided its preferences should bind every business in America. We joined this lawsuit because no state has the authority to force its regulatory agenda onto Idaho businesses and consumers who never had a say in California’s laws.

Read https://idahocapitalsun.com/2026/06/23/repub/17-gop-ags-sue-california-over-single-use-plastics-law/