4M Analytics

Imagine starting to hike up a mountain
with only knowing 60% of the trail mapped out.

That feeling is precisely what General Contractors experience during the process on new projects.

General Contractors on projects cannot quickly understand the utility landscape before bidding on a project.

What are the implications for the stakeholders?

1. High contingency costs needed to be included in the project’s budget.
2. General contractors take on nearly all responsibility for utility coordination and risk.

We can minimize

potential delays,

project ,

unexpected relocations

By giving General Contractors an early, accurate, and comprehensive understanding of the landscape.

SHOCKED...BUT NOT SURPRISED

Imagine if every profession treated their work like 99% of projects treat .

🥼 Surgeons making "last-minute" discoveries during operations.

🚀 Astronauts striking unexpected asteroids or moons in their path.

🗺 Navigation apps giving directions based on 100-year-old maps.

If it's unacceptable in other fields, why is it accepted in and ?

The truth is, not knowing where utilities are during and design phases is costing us.

Whether it's the taxpayer or the utility customer, we're paying too much for the avoidable conflicts caused by lack of information.

Time for a change... is coming.

AS-BUILT...MORE LIKE "AS IF"

The first step is admitting there's a problem.

You just can't trust an when you need to find the in your area of interest.

So why are you still spending months to find unverified, out-of-date, and non-GIS documents that you know are unreliable?

There's gotta be another way...

It just doesn't make sense to use incorrect data for planning, engineering, and bidding, and only discover utility conflicts when you're about to break ground.

To avoid damages and last-minute changes, you simply need a map that does your site justice.

Try instead.

We have the technology...why not use it?

This is what a state-wide map of subsurface utilities looks like