TryScrum.com

Most Scrum Masters use AI like a search engine.

That’s a missed opportunity.

The quality of AI’s response often depends on the quality of the prompt.

One mistake I see frequently is asking AI to solve a problem immediately.

“How do I fix this team?”

“How do I remove this impediment?”

“How do I improve collaboration?”

These questions often lead to generic answers.

Instead, try thinking systemically.

I use a simple framework called SYSTEM:

🔹 Symptoms – What are we observing?

🔹 Yielding Behaviors – What behaviors are creating these symptoms?

🔹 Structures – What organizational structures enable these behaviors?

🔹 Tensions – What competing goals or incentives exist?

🔹 Emerging Risks – What happens if nothing changes?

🔹 Measures – How will we know improvement is happening?

The shift is subtle but powerful.

Instead of asking:

❌ “How do I fix this?”

Ask:

✅ “What structures are causing this behavior?”

Many Agile challenges are not people problems.

They are system problems.

This is the first in a series of AI prompts for Scrum Masters.

What recurring team challenge would you analyze using the SYSTEM framework?

Is a Scrum Master accountable for team delivery?

Many organizations seem to think so.

The Sprint Goal wasn’t achieved.

A release slipped.

A commitment wasn’t met.

And the first question becomes:

“Why didn’t the Scrum Master ensure delivery?”

But that’s not what Scrum expects.

The Scrum Master’s accountability is not delivery management.

It is helping the Scrum Team become more effective by:

✅ Coaching

✅ Enabling impediments removal

✅ Growing self-management

✅ Helping the team focus on creating high-value Increments

✅ Improving effectiveness

A Scrum Master should absolutely care about delivery.

But caring about delivery is different from being accountable for it.

Scrum Masters create the conditions.

Scrum Teams deliver.

What’s your take?

Should Scrum Masters be held accountable for team delivery?